All posts in Related News

Can House Ways And Means Committee Break Through Gridlock On Hill Over Surprise Medical Bills?

The issue of protecting patients from surprise medical bills has been looked at as a rare problem that may draw a bipartisan compromise. But lawmakers have yet to settle on who gets stuck with the bill if not the patients. The House Ways and Means committee is just the latest to try put forward legislation. In other health care industry and costs news: air ambulance coverage, state's efforts on surprise billing, CEOs' earnings, Medicare payments, and more. More

Donations After Cardiac Death Are Starting To Show Promise For Thousands Of People Who Desperately Need Heart Transplants

Strict rules outline how and when organs can be transplanted but if this new trial method proves to be successful and safe, researchers say it could revolutionize transplantations. Other public health news is on inactive adults, millennials' thoughts on vaccines, blood pressure, body temperature, binge drinking, surgical gown recalls, health research on mice, sepsis deaths, breakthrough on sudden death of Amish children, and more. More

Rep. Ayanna Pressley Bares Insecurities As She Details Her Experience With Alopecia, Baldness

“I felt naked, exposed, vulnerable,” said Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.). She also felt that she was participating in cultural betrayal because of all the young girls who looked up to her as a congresswoman who wore braids. “I felt like I owed those little girls an explanation.” Scientists are not sure what causes the immune system to attack healthy hair follicles, but over six million people in the United States have the condition. More

KHN’s ‘What The Health?’: Trump Takes Credit Where It Isn’t Due


Can’t see the audio player? Click here to listen on SoundCloud.


The final debate for Democratic presidential candidates before the Feb. 3 Iowa caucuses did not delve as deeply into health care as some earlier debates. But it did include discussion of several health issues that have received relatively little attention, including prescription drug prices and long-term care.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump is claiming credit for having “saved” federal protections for preexisting health conditions, perhaps the most popular piece of the Affordable Care Act, even as his own administration is in court trying to have the entire health law declared unconstitutional.

And Kansas may soon become the latest state to expand the Medicaid program under the ACA, as the Democratic governor and GOP Senate majority leader strike a deal.

This week’s panelists are Julie Rovner from Kaiser Health News, Alice Miranda Ollstein of Politico, Tami Luhby of CNN and Shefali Luthra of Kaiser Health News.

Among the takeaways from this week’s podcast:

  • Some advocates have complained that the Democratic presidential candidates are not discussing threats to abortion rights during the debates. But, generally, candidates look to talk about issues that differentiate them from their primary opponents, and all of the Democrats on stage are supportive of a woman’s right to an abortion.
  • Trump’s claim this week that he was protecting the right of consumers with medical problems to get health coverage was widely derided by ACA supporters. But his contention goes to the heart of the administration’s effort to buttress its health care initiatives ahead of the campaign.
  • At the same time, the Trump administration has set a requirement for plans sold on Obamacare marketplaces to bill consumers separately for the portion of the plan that covers abortion, generally a minuscule amount. That could confuse customers and create billing headaches for insurers and prompt some to discontinue the coverage.
  • Recent action by the Supreme Court may signal some changes coming in its view of abortion rights, now that the court has a stronger conservative majority. The justices refused to take an appeals court decision upholding a Kentucky law that requires doctors to show women seeking an abortion an ultrasound image of the fetus and describe the procedure to them.

Plus, for extra credit, the panelists recommend their favorite health policy stories of the week they think you should read too:

Julie Rovner: The Deductible’s “Seven for the Twenties: A Futurist Looks at the Next Decade,” by Jeff Goldsmith

Alice Miranda Ollstein: The Wall Street Journal’s “Plan to Revamp Medicaid-Eligibility Checks Draws Criticism,” by Stephanie Armour

Tami Luhby: Vox.com’s “Everybody Covered,” by Dylan Scott, Ezra Klein and Tara Golshan

Shefali Luthra: Kaiser Health News’ “High-Deductible Plans Jeopardize Financial Health Of Patients And Rural Hospitals,” by Markian Hawryluk


To hear all our podcasts, click here.

And subscribe to What the Health? on iTunesStitcherGoogle PlaySpotify, or Pocket Casts.

More

Trump’s Claim That He ‘Saved’ Preex Conditions ‘Part Fantasy, Part Delusion’


President Donald Trump attempted to take credit for one of the most popular elements of the Affordable Care Act: Its protection for people who have preexisting medical conditions.

“I was the person who saved Pre-Existing Conditions in your healthcare,” Trump tweeted Monday.

The protection for people with medical problems has been a rallying cry for Democrats, and they used the issue to help propel their widespread election victories in 2018.

Trump repeatedly has sought to align himself with this issue — in May, for instance, claiming he would “always protect patients with preexisting conditions.” We rated that claim False. His reelection campaign has made similar claims, which experts debunked.

Trump’s recent claim that he “saved” that guarantee of coverage adds a new twist, though. We contacted the White House to find out the basis for this statement.

Judd Deere, a White House spokesman, told us, “President Trump has repeatedly stated his commitment to protect individuals with preexisting conditions and his track record shows that he has consistently done what is necessary to improve care for the vulnerable.” Deere also pointed us to a range of other policy initiatives — such as efforts on kidney health, approving generic drugs and loosening restrictions on short-term health plans.

But none of those addressed the basis of Trump’s tweet.

The health policy experts we consulted, however, were unambiguous: The president’s claim has no factual basis and flies in the face of his ongoing policy efforts.

“I feel like we’re being gas-lit,” said Linda Blumberg, a health economist at the Urban Institute. “You can’t tell me you’re the savior of people with preexisting conditions when every single thing you’ve said or done is the opposite of that.” (Gaslighting means manipulating the telling of events in such a way it leads people to question their recollections.)

This skepticism persisted across the political spectrum.

“That’s a rather extended version of aspirational rhetoric short of any evidence,” said Tom Miller, a resident fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

The Preexisting Condition Protection

Under the Affordable Care Act, or ACA, health insurance plans cannot charge people higher prices because they have a medical condition. This protection has been intact since the law took effect, under then-President Barack Obama.

As a 2016 candidate, Trump promised to repeal and replace the health law. That came to a head in 2017, when the law came within one vote in the Senate of being undone.

“That tweet is part fantasy, part delusion, part politics and all lie,” said Jonathan Oberlander, a health policy professor at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. “The president is lying about preexisting conditions. He supported, and continues to support, efforts to repeal the ACA that would take those consumer protections away.”

After that effort, Blumberg said, the president boasted that he had dismantled Obamacare — which is not only untrue, but, she added, confused many consumers.

Since then, the president has maintained his desire to undo the ACA and replace it with something new.

Neither his administration nor congressional Republicans have yet offered a replacement plan. None of the bills they have endorsed would maintain the guarantees of coverage for people with medical problems.

“By supporting repeal of the ACA, they’re supporting repeal of protecting preexisting condition prohibitions,” Robert Berenson, another analyst at the Urban Institute, previously told us.

Texas V. Azar

Meanwhile, the Trump administration’s work elsewhere could undo the protection.

A group of Republican-led states are suing to have the entire ACA dismantled. Their argument stems from a law Trump signed: the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

That law gutted the individual mandate — the ACA’s requirement that everyone have coverage or pay a penalty — by reducing the penalty to $0.

In this case, known as Texas v. Azar, the Republican states are arguing that the individual mandate was central to the ACA and that, without it, the entire law must be taken down. That would include the protections for people with preexisting conditions.

The administration has declined to defend the law in court, a move legal analysts have called almost unprecedented. The case is widely expected to go to the Supreme Court. Since the White House has unveiled no replacement, striking the law would leave a policy vacuum, allowing health plans to revert to discriminating against people with medical issues.

Miller argued that the still-pending court case and previous repeal efforts don’t necessarily mean there’s any imminent threat of the president gutting the ACA’s preexisting condition protections.

“For pure public opinion purposes, you want to say you’re protecting against preexisting condition protections,” Miller said. “Does he know how to do it? No. Is he doing anything trying to change it? Not really.”

But others noted that the administration’s stance is firmly against maintaining the ACA’s prohibitions.

“The Democrats have correctly said the Trump administration has in fact opposed protections for preexisting conditions by endorsing the lawsuit,” Berenson said.

Our Ruling

Trump tweeted that he “was the person who saved Pre-Existing Conditions in your healthcare.”

The president had nothing to do with the ban on health insurance plans discriminating against people with preexisting conditions. This consumer protection is a core part of the health care law that became law during the Obama presidency. Trump has expressly supported the repeal of this law without offering a replacement that would keep the protection intact.

And to this day, his administration is arguing in court that the law — including this provision — should be undone.

The president’s tweet is not only untrue, but it misrepresents his administration’s efforts to repeal the health care law without offering any replacement that might maintain its core protections. We rate this claim Pants on Fire.

 

 

More